Volver a Noticias
Education
8 de junio de 2026

EB-5 Adjustment of Status After the 2026 USCIS Discretion Memo — Why Concurrent Filers Hold a Stronger Position

How USCIS Policy Memo PM-602-0199 reframes adjustment of status — and why EB-5 concurrent filers under INA §245(n) hold a stronger position in 2026.

Etiquetas#Concurrent Filing#EB-5

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199 (May 21, 2026) makes adjustment of status a discretionary, “extraordinary” form of relief and positions consular processing as the default. It changes no law and eliminates no filing right. EB-5 concurrent filers are comparatively well-positioned: Congress authorized EB-5 adjustment under INA §245(n) and §245(k), and EB-5 cases lack the single-intent conflict the memo scrutinizes most. A concurrent I-485 must now be filed as a thorough, documented submission.

Key Takeaways

  1. USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199, issued May 21, 2026, directs officers to treat adjustment of status (Form I-485) as a discretionary, “extraordinary” form of relief rather than an automatic entitlement.
  2. The memo does not repeal Section 245 of the INA or eliminate EB-5 concurrent filing, which the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 expressly authorized under Section 245(n).
  3. The memo's heightened scrutiny falls hardest on single-intent applicants — for example F-1 students or visitors — whose temporary status conflicts with seeking permanent residence; EB-5 investors do not carry that “purpose mismatch.”
  4. Dual-intent categories such as H-1B and L-1 remain compatible with adjustment of status, and many EB-5 investors hold these visas — though dual-intent status alone is not sufficient to compel a favorable exercise of discretion.
  5. A properly filed EB-5 I-485 is not the same as an approved one: applications must now be prepared as thorough, documented submissions that affirmatively present positive equities.
  6. All three EB-5 reserved (set-aside) categories remained current for every country, including India, in the June 2026 Visa Bulletin — so eligible investors can file concurrently now.

For EB-5 investors already living in the United States, adjustment of status is the step that converts an approved investment into a green card without leaving the country. On May 21, 2026, USCIS reframed how it views that step — and the change has unsettled thousands of families mid-process. Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199 instructs officers to treat adjustment of status as a discretionary, “extraordinary” form of relief rather than a routine administrative step, with consular processing positioned as the default path. The stakes are real: a misread of this shift could send an investor's case abroad or expose it to avoidable denial. But for EB-5 specifically, the picture is far less alarming than the headlines suggest. Understanding why EB-5 concurrent filers stand on firmer statutory ground than most adjustment applicants is now one of the most important pieces of EB-5 filing strategy in 2026.

1. What the 2026 USCIS Discretion Memo Actually Says

USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199, issued May 21, 2026, reframes adjustment of status as a matter of “discretion and administrative grace” and an “extraordinary” form of relief — not an automatic entitlement, even when every statutory requirement is met. Adjustment of status is the process, available under Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), by which a person already inside the United States obtains a green card by filing Form I-485 — without returning to a consulate abroad.

  1. Discretion over entitlement. Officers are directed to weigh the totality of the circumstances and may now deny a case on discretionary grounds even where eligibility is fully satisfied.
  2. Consular processing as the default. The memo positions consular processing abroad as the norm and adjustment of status as the exception, accompanied by a press release stating that USCIS will grant adjustment only in extraordinary circumstances.
  3. A reminder, not a new statute. The memo does not change the law; it reinterprets how officers should apply existing discretion. As of mid-2026, implementing guidance had not been published and legal challenges were widely anticipated.

2. Does the Memo Eliminate EB-5 Concurrent Filing?

No — the memo does not eliminate EB-5 concurrent filing, which Congress expressly authorized under Section 245(n) of the INA when it passed the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022. This matters most for skilled professionals stuck in the EB-2 India backlog, who can use EB-5 to file inside the United States. Concurrent filing is the ability to file Form I-485 at the same time as the Form I-526E immigrant petition (or while it is pending) when a visa number is immediately available.

  1. A statute, not an accommodation. Section 245(n) is federal law passed in 2022; a policy memorandum cannot repeal it, so the right to file inside the United States remains intact.
  2. Section 245(k) adds a second statutory layer. For employment-based applicants, including EB-5, Section 245(k) preserves adjustment eligibility despite certain limited status lapses — up to 180 days in the aggregate — narrowing the grounds for a status-based discretionary denial.
  3. Filing is not approval. These statutes support a properly filed EB-5 I-485, but USCIS may still deny adjustment as a matter of discretion after weighing positive and negative factors.
  4. Visa availability is the gate. Concurrent filing is only possible when a visa is immediately available for your category and priority date — which, for the reserved categories, it currently is.

3. Why EB-5 Investors Are Better Positioned Than Most AOS Applicants

EB-5 investors are comparatively well-positioned because their cases do not carry the single-intent “purpose mismatch” the memo treats as a negative factor, and because Congress separately authorized EB-5 adjustment in statute. The applicants most exposed by PM-602-0199 are single-intent nonimmigrants — F-1 students, B-1/B-2 visitors — whose temporary status sits in tension with seeking permanent residence; an EB-5 investor's path to a green card raises no such conflict.

  1. A documented economic contribution is an affirmative positive equity. Each EB-5 investor commits a minimum of $800,000 to a job-creating enterprise and must create at least 10 full-time U.S. jobs — a concrete, documented contribution an investor can place on the record as a favorable factor in a discretionary adjudication.
  2. Reserved categories are current for India. Unlike the EB-2 India backlog that leaves many skilled professionals waiting for decades, all three EB-5 reserved categories remain current — so eligible investors can file concurrently today.
  3. Positive equities are built in. EB-5 investors typically present a documented lawful source of funds, capital placed at risk, and measurable job creation — the affirmative positive factors the memo now requires applicants to demonstrate.

4. What This Means If You Hold H-1B or L-1 Status

If you hold H-1B or L-1 status, you avoid the single biggest negative factor in the memo, because these dual-intent categories are expressly compatible with pursuing permanent residence. This is why many Indian H-1B holders facing decades in the EB-2 queue are turning to EB-5. Dual intent is the legal principle that allows a person to hold a temporary work visa while simultaneously pursuing permanent residence.

  1. No conflict of intent. An H-1B holder pursuing a green card is doing exactly what the visa permits, which removes one of the memo's key negative factors — improper intent or failure to maintain status.
  2. Dual intent removes a negative — it is not, by itself, a positive. The memo is explicit that maintaining a dual-intent status alone does not compel approval; you must still present the affirmative equities — clean status history, community ties, documented contribution — that the totality test now rewards.
  3. Maintained status is the strongest equity. Investors who have kept lawful status throughout, with a clean record, present the totality of positive factors officers are now instructed to look for.

5. How to Prepare Your I-485 in the New Environment

In the new environment, an EB-5 I-485 should be prepared as a thorough, affirmatively documented legal submission — not a routine form package — because the absence of negative factors is no longer enough to win approval. The discretionary framework rewards a complete, well-argued record, so preparation now matters as much as eligibility.

  1. Confirm visa availability first. Verify that a visa is immediately available for your category and priority date, and which chart governs adjustment filings that month — see the June 2026 Visa Bulletin, where all reserved categories remained current.
  2. Document the economic contribution. Present the investment amount, job-creation metrics, and lawful source and path of funds as affirmative positive factors, not just eligibility checkboxes.
  3. Evidence continuous lawful status. A clean record of maintained status, especially in a dual-intent category, directly answers the memo's primary negative factors.
  4. Work with experienced EB-5 counsel. A discretionary adjudication rewards a complete, affirmatively presented record; experienced immigration counsel is now essential rather than optional.

Summary: Adjustment of Status After PM-602-0199 — How EB-5 Compares

FactorWhere the EB-5 Concurrent Filer Stands
Statutory basis for filingINA §245(n) and §245(k) — congressional authorization a memo cannot repeal
Single-intent “purpose mismatch”None — investment-based residence raises no conflict with prior status
Visa availability (India, 2026)All three EB-5 reserved categories current in the June 2026 Visa Bulletin
Affirmative positive equitiesDocumented source of funds, capital at risk, 10+ jobs per investor
Dual-intent status (H-1B / L-1)Compatible; removes a key negative factor (though not sufficient alone)
What still must be doneFile the I-485 as a thorough, documented discretionary submission


The Bottom Line: The 2026 USCIS discretion memo raised the bar for adjustment of status across the board — but it did not move the bar against EB-5. Congress authorized EB-5 concurrent filing by statute in 2022, EB-5 cases do not carry the single-intent conflict the memo scrutinizes most heavily, and dual-intent investors who maintained lawful status present exactly the positive record officers now demand. The real risk is not the policy itself; it is filing an unprepared, under-documented I-485 in an environment that no longer rewards the bare minimum. The disciplined, well-counseled EB-5 investor is, if anything, in a stronger relative position than before.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PM-602-0199 a new law?

No. PM-602-0199 is a policy memorandum, not legislation. It reinterprets how USCIS officers should exercise existing discretion under Section 245 of the INA; it does not change the statute or its regulations. As of mid-2026, implementing guidance had not been published and legal challenges were anticipated.

Does the memo apply to a pending EB-5 I-485?

Most likely yes. Because discretion is assessed at the time of final adjudication, and because PM-602-0199 contains no grandfathering clause for cases already filed, practitioners widely read it as reaching pending I-485 applications, not only new ones. Some argue an applicant who filed in reliance on prior policy has a non-retroactivity argument, but the point is unsettled and legal challenges are anticipated. Investors with a pending I-485 should not assume they are exempt; the prudent step is to strengthen the affirmative record now, with qualified counsel.

Is EB-5 Reserved still current for India in 2026?

Yes. In the June 2026 Visa Bulletin, all three EB-5 reserved (set-aside) categories remained current for every country, including India. That means an eligible Indian investor can file Form I-485 concurrently with, or after, the I-526E petition now.

Can an EB-5 investor still choose consular processing instead?

Yes. Consular processing through a U.S. embassy or consulate abroad remains available and is the path the memo positions as the default. Whether adjustment of status or consular processing is the better route depends on an investor's status, travel needs, and individual circumstances.

Does the memo change the September 30, 2026 grandfathering deadline?

No. The grandfathering deadline governs when an I-526E petition must be filed to remain protected if the Regional Center Program lapses; it is separate from the adjustment-of-status process. The September 30, 2026 deadline still applies.

Across Beyond International Group's platform, 712 I-526 petitions have been approved and every sponsored project has secured I-956F approval — USCIS's project-level review of the business plan and job-creation model — as of 2026, the institutional discipline that stands behind a thoroughly documented filing.

Beyond International Group serves as your fiduciary NCE Manager — backed by an institutional fund platform — applying the same rigor to your filing strategy and immigration protection that we apply to every fund we manage.

If you are seeking an EB-5 project with strong immigration protection, a documented job-creation and source-of-funds profile, and a reserved-category pathway that is current for India, Beyond Paradise 1 is an opportunity not to be missed.

Schedule a Free Consultation Today.

Compartir este artículo

Glossary terms in this article

Process

EB-5 Concurrent Filing: I-526E + I-485 Together

Concurrent filing lets EB-5 investors physically present in the US in valid status file I-526E and I-485 together, unlocking EAD + Advance Parole within roughly 3-6 months — without waiting for I-526E adjudication first.

Foundations

What is the EB-5 Reform & Integrity Act (RIA) 2022?

The RIA reauthorised the Regional Center EB-5 program through 2027, created reserved-visa set-asides (20% rural, 10% urban TEA, 2% infrastructure), reduced the sustainment period from 5 to 2 years, and added integrity measures (audits, source-of-funds reviews, I-956F project approval).

Process

EB-5 Visa Bulletin: How to Read It in 2026

The State Department publishes a monthly Visa Bulletin showing which EB-5 priority dates are current per country. Rural TEA is current for all countries through 2026; Unreserved EB-5 has long backlogs for India and China.

Foundations

I-526E vs I-526: What changed under the Reform Act?

I-526E is the post-2022 petition for Regional Center investors after the EB-5 Reform & Integrity Act. I-526 is the legacy form for direct EB-5.

Money

Source of Funds: the #1 cause of EB-5 denial

USCIS requires every dollar of your $800K to trace back to a lawful source. Poor documentation is the most common cause of RFEs and denials.

Timeline

September 30, 2026 grandfathering deadline

The Reform Act's $800K set-aside is grandfathered for petitions filed by September 30, 2026. After that, the program could change.

Diligence

I-956F project approval — why it matters for you

I-956F is USCIS's pre-vetting of the EB-5 project itself. Filing I-526E against an already-approved I-956F means much faster individual adjudication.

Diligence

EB-5 NCE Manager: What to Look For

The NCE Manager holds your $800K and decides how it deploys, gets monitored, and (eventually) returns. NCE Manager quality matters more than Regional Center brand.