TL;DR
If the project creates the required 10 jobs and repays the NCE before the investor's sustainment period or I-829 is complete, the NCE must **redeploy** capital into a new at-risk investment to keep the investor compliant. Redeployment terms (control, sector, exit) materially affect repayment timing.
Redeployment exists because USCIS requires capital to remain at-risk through the investor's sustainment period — even if the underlying project performs faster than expected. Post-RIA, the sustainment period is 2 years from NCE deployment, so the redeployment risk has decreased relative to pre-RIA. But for backlogged-country investors who wait years between filing and conditional GC, redeployment can still materialise.
Redeployment was the silent risk of pre-RIA EB-5. Post-RIA, structurally well-designed Rural projects can avoid redeployment entirely — but only if the project's structure is built around the 2-year window.
Beyond Paradise 1 is structured for **no mandatory redeployment** for investors in current-visa countries — the 3+1+1 loan + Rural Reserved category combine to align capital deployment with the 2-year sustainment minimum.
Related
The "at-risk" requirement
Your $800K must remain "at risk" — exposed to both gain and loss — through the conditional residence period. No guaranteed returns, no pre-arranged buybacks.
Repayment timeline: when do you get your $800K back?
EB-5 capital is repaid after the project's job creation is complete and the at-risk period has ended — typically 5-7 years from investment, depending on the project.
Rural TEA vs Urban TEA vs Direct EB-5
Rural TEA = $800K + 20% visa set-aside + priority processing. Urban TEA = $800K + 10% set-aside. Direct EB-5 = $1.05M, no Regional Center.
Want a personalized EB-5 roadmap based on your profile?
Build my profile